AI Disruption and the Software Selloff: What It Means for US CLOs

In recent months investors have grown increasingly concerned about the potential for AI to disrupt traditional software business models. New releases in AI models such as Anthropic’s¹ Claude have prompted a reassessment of how resilient software firms are. For credit investors, the issue is particularly relevant: Software represents a meaningful share of US collateralized loan obligation (CLO) exposures. Understanding whether the perceived disruption risk is justified is therefore crucial when evaluating potential vulnerabilities and opportunities across CLO portfolios. 

Sell first ask questions later 

A wave of indiscriminate selling has recently hit software stocks on fears that generative AI could cannibalize software companies’ business models.

Figure 1: Selloff in software stocks 

Source: Bloomberg, February 2026. Indices S&P500 (SPX) and S&P500 Software (S5SOFT). Past performance is not a guide to the future. 

Software and software as-a-service (SaaS) leveraged loans have also fallen this year so far amid selling by CLO managers and loan funds reacting to the tech turmoil. Year-to-date (mid-February), US and European technology loans (which include software) are down roughly 3% versus a flat broader loan index. 11% of technology loans within the Bloomberg US Leveraged Loan Index are now classified as distressed based on trading levels, up from approximately 6% at year end.²

Figure 2: Selloff in software-related leverage loans

Source: Bloomberg, February 2026. Indexes: Bloomberg US Technology Leveraged Loan Index (I39241US) and Bloomberg US Leveraged Loan Index (I38932US). Past performance is not a guide to the future. 

Concerns around software loans are not totally without justification, in our view. Loan market software exposure is skewed toward lower-rated single B and CCC rated loans and is concentrated in the 2021 vintage, with roughly 16% of loans originated in 2021.  

Figure 3: Leveraged loan software exposure and software exposure by vintage

Source: LCD Morningstar, Morgan Stanley Research. 

There is also considerable dispersion in the performance of software loans. The sector is broad, and some business models are far more exposed to AIdriven disintermediation than others. Enterprise software providers, with deeply embedded customer relationships and sticky, mission-critical revenue streams, appear relatively insulated. By contrast, certain applicationbased software firms may face greater competitive pressure, depending on how close their products sit to the underlying data and how large the total addressable market (TAM) is.  

Broadly speaking, the closer a company is to the data and the smaller its TAM, the lower the risk of meaningful AI substitution. And if we also consider softwareadjacent issuers, such as a healthcare services company that supplies software into hospital workflows, the proportion of issuers that face disruption risk increases. 

What’s the size of software exposure in CLOs?  

CLOs are major holders of sub-investment grade software loans. In the US loan market, software now accounts for roughly $235 billion of loans (approximately 16% of the $1.5 trillion leveraged loan index), making it one of the largest single sectors. By contrast, software-related issuers represent only about 3.5% of the US high-yield bond universe. Software companies have tapped the leveraged loan market heavily in recent years, funding a surge of privateequity buyouts that were underpinned by the appeal of subscriptionbased revenues, and potentially attractive margins and steady cash flows. 

Figure 4: Software/SaaS exposure by US credit segment

Credit segment	Software Saas exposure (% of market)
US Leverage Loan Index	c.16% (c.$1.5 trillion loan market)
US BLS CLO Collateral	c.12% - 15%
US Private Credit CLO	c.19%
BDC Loan Portfolios	c.20% - 26%
US High-Yeild Index	c.3% - 5%

Source: Morgan Stanley Research (February 2026); Bloomberg Intelligence/BofA (January 2026).  

Resilience of CLOs  

Despite negative sentiment in software loans, CLOs have numerous features that seek to protect senior tranches: 

• Structural credit enhancements: CLOs are built with substantial loss-absorbing buffers. “Subordination” is a feature whereby equity and lower-rated junior bondholder tranches serve as credit support for the higher-rated senior bonds absorbing all losses from defaults on the underlying loans first. This resilience is bolstered by over-collateralization and interest coverage tests: If too many loans default or migrate to CCC ratings, excess cash is diverted away from equity to pay down the senior notes early, preserving their principal. As a result, senior CLO tranches (AAA through A) have had zero impairments in the modern era—since 2010 (Moody’s Impairment and loss rates of structured finance securities survey). 
• Diversification³ and concentration limits: By design, CLO collateral pools are spread across 100+ issuers and diverse industries, with explicit limits on maximum industry exposure (typically 10–15%). This means no single sector’s woes—even a big sector like software—can overwhelm the portfolio.  
• Reinvestment flexibility: CLOs are actively managed and the CLO manager can reinvest principal proceeds into new loans for several years. Hence the CLO manager has the ability to adjust the CLO portfolio to changing conditions or opportunities—reducing exposure to risker areas or taking risk when areas of the market look relatively cheap.  

Portfolio implications 

Software typically represents 12–15% of CLO portfolios, making the sector’s potential AIrelated disruption an important consideration for investors. Although default rates among software borrowers remain low for now, heightened concerns about AI substitution combined with challenging capitalmarket conditions could increase refinancing risk for the many software issuers with debt maturing over the next three to four years. 

For CLO investors, any deterioration in credit performance is most likely to be felt lower down the capital stack, where equity and mezzanine tranches are the first to absorb losses. By contrast, senior CLO tranches can potentially benefit from structural protection⁴ and active portfolio management, providing cushions that could help them withstand even a moderate rise in softwarerelated defaults. 

Eric Fink, Senior Research Analyst at L&G – Asset Management, and John Daly, Senior Solutions Strategy Manager at L&G – Asset Management, authored this blog. 

1. For illustrative purposes only. Reference to a particular security does not mean that the security has been, is currently held or will be held within L&G – Asset Management portfolio. The above information does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
2. Source: Bloomberg intelligence credit strategy dashboard (BI STRTN), Leveraged Loan Data library as of February 16, 2026. 
3. It should be noted that diversification is no guarantee against a loss in a declining market. 
4. References to protection and structural protection are general strategic terms. There is no protection guarantee. Past performance is not a guide to the future. The value of an investment and any income taken from it is not guaranteed and can go down as well as up, you may not get back the amount you originally invested.

Disclosures

Unless otherwise stated, references herein to "LGIM", "we" and "us" are meant to capture the global conglomerate that includes Legal & General Investment Management Ltd. (a U.K. FCA authorized adviser), Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. (a U.S. SEC registered investment adviser) and Legal & General Investment Management Asia Limited (a Hong Kong SFC registered adviser). The LGIM Stewardship Team acts on behalf of all such locally authorized entities.

This material is intended to provide only general educational information and market commentary. Views and opinions expressed herein are as of the date set forth above and may change based on market and other conditions. The material may not be reproduced or distributed. The material is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a solicitation to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or to provide any investment advice or service. Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. does not guarantee the timeliness, sequence, accuracy or completeness of information included. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance and no representation, express or implied, is made regarding future performance.

Certain of the information contained herein represents or is based on forward-looking statements or information, including descriptions of anticipated market changes and expectations of future activity. Forward-looking statements and information are inherently uncertain and actual events or results may differ from those projected. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements and information. There is no guarantee that LGIM America's investment or risk management processes will be successful.